Quantcast
Channel: Power management forum - Recent Threads
Viewing all 35901 articles
Browse latest View live

TPS2411: Device with Over Voltage Monitor with Abs Max Greater than 19V

$
0
0

Part Number: TPS2411

Hi Team,

Just want to ask to double check and see if there's a device similar to the TPS2411 OR-ing controller with voltage monitoring capabilities that can operate to a higher limit of at least 19V? I'm looking to use it in a redundant power configuration with the input voltage nominally at 12V but can potentially go up to 19V, in which case I want OV to kick in.

Alternatively I'm looking into using the LM74700-Q1 with the TPS24750. Would that be a suitable option?

Thanks for the help in advance,

Jerry


LM74700-Q1: LM74700-Q1

$
0
0

Part Number: LM74700-Q1

Hi - I am using LM74700 as an ideal diode controller for reverse battery/current protection.   I am concerned about the inrush current since the body diode will conduct first. 

The other concern I have is the since the body diode of the N-MOSFET will always conduct, if the LM74700 fails for whatever reason, that will leave the N-MOSFET unprotected and potentially damaged.

Can LM74700 work with the below setup?

 

Thanks!

BQ27425-G2A: Fuel Gauge showing wrong battery percentage vs real measurement

$
0
0

Part Number: BQ27425-G2A

In our design we have 2 separated Li-Ni-Co-Mn  batteries we monitor. One is 850mAh and the other is 2000mAh. We have 2 settings in our SW and when user indicate which battery he is using (2000 or 850) we load up the battery values in to the device NVRAM.

The Fuel Gauge seems to provide SOC in a correct way to the 850mAh battery, but the 2000mAh battery SOC is way off. The Fuel gauge report 0% when battery is around 40% per our measurements. 

For both batteries we changed the  Design capacity and Termination voltage dramatically, just to see how much it changed the SOC reading. When we read from NVRAM, we can see that the values we burned are exactly as we burned them. But when we test the battery the change is minor in the SOC....it was as if the SOC is set to a specific default Battery and it reads our tested batteries in the same method no matter how we change the Design capacity and Termination voltage.

The Fuel gauge monitor the Voltage and current very accurately when compared to real measurements we do in the setups. 

Once again, the 850mAh battery seems to be monitored correctly by the Fuel Gauge, but the 2000mAh is way off. 

Attaching 2 files :

1. TALK TIME PCB234 Int - FG off- 2000mA - I this excel you can the 2000 battery can go down to 2.8V and then shut down, while our system shut the device down when Fuel Gauge read 5% battery. From the graph you can see the device was shut down at round half way of the battery life and not at the last 5%. 

In the Excel you can see also the parameters we set to the Fuel Gauge.

Thanks

(Please visit the site to view this file)

LM74700-Q1: LM74700-Q1

$
0
0

Part Number: LM74700-Q1

Hi - 

I have the same concerns about the inrush current through the nMOFSET body diode as well.   When nMOSFET is controlled by the LM74700, the initial inrush will flow through the body diode before the FET is turned on.   Even worse, if LM74700 fails for whatever reason, that will leave the nMOSFET unprotected, over-heated and get damaged. 

Will the below configuration work?   If not, what else circuit could be added to make it work to drive back-to-back nMOSFET (Drain connected together)?

  

Thanks!

TPS22915BEVM-078: Maximum current carrying capacity of Quick output Discharge (QoD) MOSFET/resistor

$
0
0

Part Number: TPS22915BEVM-078

Hi,

I am planning to use TPS22915B to enter into ship mode for my device. While entering into ship mode (commands sent over USB), I have a condition where the switch is turned off but because I have a USB connected, VOUT pin of TPS22915B still sees a voltage (approx 4.5V). I then remove the USB to go into actual ship mode.

I want to know the maximum current handling capacity of the MOSFET connected between VOUT and GND. Currently I can measure upto 30 mA flowing through it. 

LMZ31707: Disabling the output

$
0
0

Part Number: LMZ31707

Hi,

I have a board with the LMZ31707 installed, I need to perform a test with a different voltage source with the same voltage, other than removing the part from the board, can I just  disable it by connecting INH/UVLO to ground and connect an external voltage source to the VOUT rail?

Thanks,

SB

Low vin Isolator solution

$
0
0

We like to do Vin 9~36V to DC12V 20A, any recommend for this spec, thanks!!

TPS23753A: PoE power loop with diode bridge

$
0
0

Part Number: TPS23753A

Hi Darwin,

I would like to know if both of two connections of PoE power line are okay to design? (please aee the yellow circle of the circuit in attached file)

Any concern (e.g., EMC )for that ?

It seems connection2 has more thermal performance because the current loop in different HD01(diode bridge) at the same time.

Thanks!

Chin

(Please visit the site to view this file)


TPS7A8300: Pin 1 Quadrant at Q1

$
0
0

Part Number: TPS7A8300

Hi,

I would like to clarify what is the actual Pin 1 location inside the pocket for part#TPS7A8300RGRR.

Based on the parts that received, the Pin 1 is located at Quadrant 1 instead of Quadrant 2 where stated in datasheet.

Need to seek for expert to clarify and provide the answer for this question.

Thanks.

(Please visit the site to view this file)

LM5069:LM5069 Undervoltage lockout and overvoltage lockout abnormality

$
0
0

Part Number: LM5069

The schematic is shown

Basic parameter settings:
1, the overvoltage threshold is set to 27V
2, the undervoltage threshold is set to 15V
3, D5 diode voltage drop is 0.7V

Debugging issues:
1. When adjusting the external input voltage to 30V input, measure the LV50 pin's OVLO pin voltage to exceed the 2.7V overvoltage lockout threshold, but the GATE pin will not be pulled down by the internal current source and still output 37V.

BQ25703A: Unexpected Behaviour when Discharging from Battery (USB OTG) in USB-C Application

$
0
0

Part Number: BQ25703A

Hi there,

I am working on a design which is essentially a USB-C battery bank, with a 3S battery. Attached is a snippet of the schematic design, which has basically been lifted from the USB-C power bank example provided by TI.

The unexpected behaviour I am seeing occurs when the design is being used to to power a UFP from the battery in USB OTG mode (i.e. discharging the battery), using the BQ25703 in reverse mode as a step-up converter (stepping up from Vbat = 12.6V up to Vbus = 20V in the examples shown below).

There are a few observations I'd like to discuss:

1) There is audible noise coming from the circuit (from the inductor I believe) at low to medium loads up to around a 500mA load. Up to this current, the audible noise is an irregular clicking noise. This increases in frequency as the current increases, and then suddenly stops at around 500mA after which point it seems to never re-occur. My first thought was that this would coincide with the PFM vs PWM modes of the IC, but I have enabled the EN_OOA option, with no noticeable effect.

2) At these low output currents (up to 500mA), the output voltage of 20V is very unstable. I have taken some oscilloscope plots to demonstrate this behaviour:

200mA output current, SW2 and SW1 shown:

200mA output current, SW2 and VBUS shown (as you can see, the 20V output rail is extemely unstable):

1A output current, SW2 and SW1 shown:

1A output current, SW2 and VBUS shown:

The 1A plots above are as I would expect, but at 200mA the behaviour is strange, and the 20V output very unstable.

3) The 2u2 inductor seems to get very hot. Even at output currents of 1 or 2 amps, the inductor body gets up to around 60 - 75 degrees celcius. This seems on the high side to me, and makes me concerned about using the design to source 60W or more as the design should be capable of. Note - I have tried a number of inductors, as explained later. Side question - does TI recommend heat-sinking this switching inductor on their battery bank designs?

4) The efficiency is not as I would expect. Please see the plot below for efficiency performance at both 800kHz and 1200kHz operation - at lower power they seem to be as I would expect, but as the power output increases, the efficiency seems to tail off quite rapidly, whereas the datasheet states that the efficiency should remain above 94% in this power range for a 3S battery and USB OTG of 20V.

My assumption is that all 4 unexpected symptoms above stem from the same issue, and I am wondering if you had any ideas what this issue could be?

Please note that I have tried several 2u2 inductors (as I was concerned about DCR, saturation current etc), with the only noticeable difference being that the the one with an over-rated saturation voltage (Vishay Dale IHLP3232DZER2R2M01, Isat=23A) didn't seem to get quite as hot as the others.

Thanks for reading,

Iain.

LM5069:LM5069 Undervoltage lockout and overvoltage lockout abnormality

$
0
0

Part Number: LM5069

The schematic is shown

Basic parameter settings:
1, the overvoltage threshold is set to 27V
2, the undervoltage threshold is set to 15V
3, D5 diode voltage drop is 0.7V

Debugging issues:
1. When adjusting the external input voltage to 30V input, measure the LV50 pin's OVLO pin voltage to exceed the 2.7V overvoltage lockout threshold, but the GATE pin will not be pulled down by the internal current source and still output 37V.

TPS61022: TPS61022 Circuit for VINTPS61022

$
0
0

Part Number: TPS61022

Hi, Team,

Can the below attached configuration support Vinmin=4V?


Best Regards,
Satoshi Yone

MC33063A: Low conversion efficiency

$
0
0

Part Number: MC33063A

Dear all:

         I'm using MC33063A with input of 10~35V and output of 5V.In the actual test, when the input VIN=24V and the load is 5V/300mA, the input current is 110mA. The conversion efficiency is 5*0.3/(24*0.11)=56.8%

But the data sheet says conversion efficiency is 83.7. Why is the result of my test 56.8%? Any Suggestions?Here is my schematic




TPS2663: Ron vs temperature at 5V VIN


TPS2493: TPS2493: recommendation to use LM5069 instead

$
0
0

Part Number: TPS2493

Hello,

We are wondering why TI is recommending to use LM5069 over TPS2493, as LM5069 seems to be a much older part than TPS2493.

Thank you

Kind Regards

Romain Farkas

BQ34Z100-G1: Learning cycle for similar batteries from different manufacturers

$
0
0

Part Number: BQ34Z100-G1

Hello,

A learning cycle is performed with a Battery A. The system based on BQ34Z100-G1 is working as expected in this scenario.

Later, a new Battery B (similar from battery A, except the capacity and manufacturer) is introduced and need to be evaluated. The chemistry ID matching tool suggest the same ID for battery A and B.

In order to perform the learning cycle for the battery B, I use same settings from battery A and change the variables regarding the capacity and reset the Update Status register to zero (0). After that, I perform the learning cycle as described below:

  1. discharge
  2. relax
  3. charge
  4. relax
  5. discharge
  6. relax

After finished the charge (step 3) the update status register change to 0x06, which differs from the TRM, where the value 0x06 is set after step #6 (relax).

Please, may I know if the procedure described to develop a similar batteries is okOthers registers need to be change? 

Thanks

TPS54335A: Over current protection and reverse current

$
0
0

Part Number: TPS54335A

Hi, 

Could you please give me your advice about TPS54335A for soft-start and reverse current? Below are the questions.

1. The soft-start time is 2ms. How will the Iout be shift from soft-start mode to normal mode after 2msec. Could you please give me the sequence for the transition from soft-start to normal output?

2. In the case which there is a large capacitor at OUT after POR, could you please let me know the sequence if the large out current is required and over curret condition is caused after POR.

-> For 1 and 2, I summarized the  timing chart as attached file. Could you please correct it?

(Please visit the site to view this file)

3. When Vin is off and the condition Vin < Vout is happened, the 100~200mA current is follow from PH to Vin as below block.

Is there problem in this case?

Regards,
Nagata. 

If the application (such as large capacity at output) require more than 2ms.

Regards,
Nagata.

UCC28220-Q1: interleaved boost converter

$
0
0

Part Number: UCC28220-Q1

Hello there,

I am currently working on the UCC28220q1 for interleaved boost converter. I wanted to know how the current sensing should be performed ? As if we use the current transformer, we don't get the DC offset. So what should be done in regarding this. Also, what is the range of control voltage pin, is it 0-3.3 or 0-3 ?

Thanks and Regards,

Akshay  

UCC256303: not use BW pin of UCC256303

$
0
0

Part Number: UCC256303

Dear Sir,

When BW pin is not using, how to set the BW pin. open or GND?

thanks.

Viewing all 35901 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>